The Mysteries of the Bible
Foreword
This text represents a summary condensed of a thesis that aims to explain why the Ancient Testament
differs fundamentally from the New Testament..
The Facts that are here quoted, will have to be a day inevitably taken in consideration because they do not come from vivid imagination of an science-fiction enthusiast, but they come from a systematic study of the original hebrew texts that alone
have not changed one iota during centuries.
All available translations on the market, take some liberties facing of these origin texts and even the french writer Voltaire , showed it already, in XVIII th century. As no one will be able to accuse this thesis to be insincerity, if he is not capable
to prouve in the form, that is to say word for word
that it is false.As for the content, each person is free to have its own interpretation. (Example each can imagine as it wants what represents the tree of the knowledge of good and evil quoted in the beginning of the Genesis).
The future will tell soon who has disguised the truth and why?
because"for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be
known."
(Matthew.
X-26).
Secret that is a bit nevertheless already revealed in these verses of the Ecclesiaste:
"There is no remembrance of former things; neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come
after." (Words of the ECCLESIATE chap.1
vers.11.)
"What has been done will be done again there nothing under the
sun."(chap.1
vers.9.)
But we find still better : "Is there anything of which one can
say ,Look! This is something new?
It was here already long ago ; it was here before our time.
"(chap.1 vers.10.)
I Introduction
Despite its
3 500 years
old the Bible, memory of the part of
humanity situated by
the west of the Indus river
, does not cease to fascinate us . After of long centuries of hypotheses, of translations, and of varied interpretations, and despite all researches and archaeological discoveries, we have not always uncovered its mysteries. In spite of its publishing under all forms and of its adaptation to the cinema, from all the literature inspireted by it, the interest that it arouses does not deny. Translated in
2092 languages
is approximately one third of the Earth dialects ,
598
for Africa,
365
for America,
520
for Asia and
344
for Oceania.It is truly the absolute best-seler .In
1994
year of record some
18.4 millions
of bibles have been distributed in the world and if we add to this total the distribution of the alone New Testament, we reach then the hardly believable number of
600 millions
of copies. The defeat of ideologies, the gallop of atheism, the scientific discoveries on the evolution of species, do not seem in anything to decrease the success of the Bible. But what are therefore original texts that have caused such a phenomenon.
II The original texts.
A thing is certain : Preserved manuscripts that here and there in the world, in Cambridge, in Jerusalem, or Geneva are only
of copies of copies.
Until
1947, apart from the
Codex Siniaiticus
(about 350 after
J.C)
and the
Codex Vaticanus
(equally about 350 after
J.C)
that have been written in Greek, the most ancient copy of the Bible, whose we had, ascended about the year 1000 after J.C.such
Codex of prophets of Cairo,
finished in 895 or the
hebrew Babylonicus Codex of 916 after JC. The most ancient complete copie of the Bible, the
Leningradensis Codexis,
iis dated of 1008 after J.C.The most ancient complete copie of the Bible, the Leningradensis Codexis, is dated
of 1008
after J.C.then it was at the beginning
of 1947,
an youth bedouin nammed
Mohamed ahd-Dhib, then who has been looking for a lost ewe , discovered at Qumram, in a cave situated to west of the
Dead Sea, tens of jars containing close to
200 writing covered rolls, in an excellent state of conservation.These manuscripts ascended to 2d or 1st century before J.C. By over all, their content is proven identical to that of the Leningradensis Codex .
1200 years of flawless fidelity, despite the many
perigrinations of the Israel people. Although we do not have always until this day an complete Hebrew manuscript of Ancient Testament anterior to the Xe century after J.C, the Dead Sea scrolls demonstrate therefore that we can indisputably trust them.
In the
Middle Ages
the Bible existed only in an alone basic version, that was the
Saint Jerome's
(331-420),
written in Latin, and called "the
Vulgate" remainig near to one thousand years thework of reference until the printing invention by Gutenberg in 1450 and it was
Lefevre d' Etaples who in
1530, printed in
Anvers, the first French Bible, drawn from the Vulgate.
Then this will be calvinist Olivetan who in 1535
published the first French Bible, drawn from the original Hebrew and Greek
texts. Wars of religions have led Catholic and Protestant churches to propose translations conform with each doctrine. For example for the Jew and Protestant Ancient Testament are following the same canon, but Catholics add to it 7 spurious books which consist in Greek passages (Tobie, Judith, 1st et 2nd Maccabees, Sagesse, Siracide ou Ecclesiastes,
Baruch) so as Greek passages of
Esther and of Daniel which are rejected by Jews and Protestants.
The orthodox Greeks
, them, add to the catholic canon a 3rd and a 4th
Maccabees, the prayer of Manasse, so as the psalm 151th
( The other confessions stop to the 150th ).
But let us analyze now , the mystery of the term Elohim, that appears in the first verse of the Ancient Testament of the hebrew Bible:
" In the beginning, Elohim created the heaven and the
Earth."
(Let us specify that we do not caution any
sect or movement requesting of the pre-eminence of the Elohim in our civilisation
such as for exemple "the
RAEL mouvement".)
III From the presence of the Elohim in the Ancien Testament
On Mars the 5th 1616 the
"Inquisition" blacklisted the
Copernic's system, that expelled the Earth planet out of its preferential position in the center of the Universe and denied thus the
Geocentrism extolled by
Ptoleme of 2nd century after J.C
and whose the main work titled the "Amalgeste"will remain, during close to
14 centuries, the very referenced anthology for astronomers.
The condemnation of the Copernic's system was thus written: " The Saint-Office considers the assertion that the sun is immobile on the center of the World, is absurd, false, heretical, and clearly opposite to the Scriptures. Similarly the fact to assert, that the Earth is not the center of the World, that it is not immobile, and that it turns on itself , is an absurd opinion and erroneous from a theological point of
view."
It is therefore as logical now to win acceptance for the new translations of the Ancient Testament
(in small reduction
A.T.) realized by Hebrew and arameen specialists in aim to discover there the existence of a new planetary order, not still suspected by the yesterday exegists, because from the one hand, these former have been influenced by ideas and constraints of their period, and from the other hand, it is more than probable that of precious "pages" of the A.T. have been lost or excluded for of various reasons.
It is therefore as logical now to win acceptance for the new translations of the
Ancient Testament
(A.T.) realized by Hebrew and arameen specialists in aim to discover there the existence of a new planetary order, not still suspected by the yesterday exegists, because from the one hand, these former have been
influenced by ideas and constraints of their period, and from the other hand, it is more than probable that
precious
"passages"
of the A.T. have been
lost or excluded for of various reasons.
Furthermore, on July the 20th of 1969, at 16h17 of the West Indies time
, a spaceship,which left the Earth planet, posed on the Moon and exactly at
22h56, an man nammed
Neil Armstrong, walked on the ground of our natural satellite, for the
first time of the known history of our civilization. But however, approximately a year before, in 1968, appeared a surprising book of a certain
Jean SENDY, great specialist of Hebrew texts of the Ancient Testament, and that was titled:
"The Moon, key of the
Bible", and that was followed in
1969 by an other book: "These Gods who created the heavens and the
Earth".
Jean SENDY now deceased, made part of these famous researchers, as Erich von Daniken, Andrew Tomas, Brinsley le Poer Trench, Robert Charroux, Guy Tarade or so as Maurice Chatelain
(ancient NASA 's specialist
) or Pierre-Jean Moatti
(Ancient french Prefect)
and many others, unnammed here by lack of place, that have given them for mission a totally revolutionary task and diametrically opposite with what is presented to us for centuries by the priests and scientists.These researchers therefore, are travelling through the whole World researching vestiges relating the most ancient myths of the humanity, to prove that what was realized by men of the Earth July the
20th of 1969 by landing on the Moon,
occurred also in remote times and that similarly the Earth, was visited by of celestial travelers who have been then confused with Gods.Indeed, we find the presence of these
Gods in Indian, Tibetan Chinese, maya, astec, Egyptian, Greek,Roman,...etc mythologies, and we could have a surprise that only the sacred text of the Ancient Testament (A.T) does not make any allusion of this Gods. But new translations are appeared, and according to them, the Genesis seems also, before all, to
tell the history of entities who came from the sky to bring us the knowledge and the wisdom.
Indeed the words ELOHIM et ADONAI
of the Hebrew text of the A.T and translated into
God and Lord
are plurals of
Eloah and of Adon
and therefore would have to be replaced by
Gods and Lordships. Alone bibles of first "CHOURAQUI,
(COL.Desclee de Brouwer)",
this one every times, and sometimes that of
"DHORME
(COL. La Pleiade)", transmit to us the term
ELOHIM at the place of the other designations of God and are the only bibles allowing us to follow the original text,
if we do not know any word of Hebrew.
But these two authors are contradicting themselves
sometimes justly concerning this plural. An example among so others: In Genesis ch. III v. 5, Dhorme writes: "your eyes will be opened and you will be like
gods." (note the small "
g " for
gods). Chouraqui writes himself for the same verse: "your eyes will be opened and you will be as
Elohim".
(note well especially the absence of the "plural"
and the capital
"E" for
Elohim). The bible of every day life French language of "l'Alliance Biblique
Universelle"
of 1996 proposes us itself the version: "You will see things such they are, you will be as
him". Let us retain by the way, that the other Bibles write either,
"...you will be as of
gods", or "...you will be as God
".
We discover therefore, beyond any dispute that these translators of the
A.T. are, on this point, in formal
contradiction. This proves assuredly
that the Hebrew text has well and truly disturbed
them. The only translation being able to agree all these authors would have to be: "....you will be as the
Elohim",
and this plural would have to be transcribed in a bible that we could then name : "The Cosmic
Bible", and that would preserve the term
"Elohim" everywhere where it is appearing in the hebrew text .Elsewhere according to the imposing Hebrew treaty of
FABRE D'OLIVET
"the hebrew language restored" the term Elohim means very exactly
"He them who are".
( To see also"
The Israel secret keys"
of A.D.GRAD at the Rocher publishings
).
(Mr A. D. GRAD who speaks close to ten languages, has published
23 books on the hebrew Kabbale , and is considered as a world specialist of this mystical and esoteric science. We got the great privilege of to meet him in 1990 on Martinique island where he lives
actualy.)
Here is also, in Dhorme's Genesis Chap.XXXV
vers.7, this staggering plural: "He builds an altar and he called the
place " El of Bethel ",
because it was there the Elohim revealed themselves to him
while he was fleeing from his
brother." And however, for the same passage, Chouraqui, himself, prefers the singular: "he called the place:
EL of Beit-El
because there Elohim appeared unto him
when he fled from the face of its
brother."
Other example: In the Deuteronome ch. 6 ver. 4, usual bibles write: " Hear Israel Adonai is our God, Adonai is one" or we find also ..."Hear Israel:The Lord our God The Lord is
One" .What would have to be translated by taking account of plurals of Elohim and Adonai: "
Hear Israel , our lords the Elohim, our Lords are
one". We understand then, in this last case, that it concerns there a
celestial race of entities, undoubtedly with the same figures as identical twins, or as clones, and applying the famous adage:"
One for All, and All for one ". They can then act one to the position of the other, have all the same power, and are therefore recognizable from a distance.
To these who are not still convinced of the plurality of the Elohim here is an other very significant passage which is found in all known bibles in
Genesis ch.3; ver 22:
"Here is that the man has become as one of
us", and some bibles write even "one between
us",
what we can not in any way qualified of a majestic plural, because in this case IahvÈ the Elohim would have told "Here is that the man has become as
Us" (with a "capital
U" or the
"Royal We"). But since there is "one", so there is inevitably "the
other", somewhere, among us. It is therefore here evident that IahvÈ does not speak neither to Adam, nor to Eve, because it would have
told:" You here is become as
Me" . But
if he was spoking to himself in private it would have told "Here is that the man has become as Me ", but if it
tells " one of us ", it is because he is very speaking to
the others Elohim as himself, who was present at this moment there in the garden of
Eden. Note however that the bible of Universal Biblical Alliance
(A.B.U) skirts the difficulty by proposing the translation:
"Here is that the man has become as a
god".
This is so true that we see the appearition abruptly without explanation in ch 6, v.2, these "t he Sons of
God" or these "the sons of
Elohim" according to the chosen Bible. Yet the Hebrew
" bnei ha
Elohim"
means beyond any dispute: "the sons of the
Elohim".
(to see about this subject: "The Moon key of the Bible"
of J.SENDYat
J'ai LU's Publisher
).We see then that all usual bibles have preferred to suppress this "the" before Elohim, too, in an expression provingthat the Elohim were numerous and that they had furthermore, sons capable to "knock up" the beautiful earthlings always very attractive on this planet.Note also the surprising version of the
(A.B.U) for these son of God: "the residents of the
sky".
These sons of the Elohim where come-they? We discover them here without no preliminary description, what proves although that the hebrew texts having given birth to the
A.T. have reached us
under a fragmentary form
and that these texts have been transcribed gradually after a lot of transformations and of oblivions. These "sons
of the Elohim" have elsewhere been later confused with the
"angels"
of immaterial nature by excellence, while the Hebrew text perfectly precise
that they made children with daughters of
men, that they had judiciously chosen.
( Note by passing, according to
A.D.GRAD
in " The secret keys of
Israel", that these Elohim could have maybe come from
"Arqâ" place or planet still remaining to identify: To see the verse in
Chaldaic language in I King XVIII, 24 which is translates
according to A.D.GRAD with a totally incongruous and inappropriate manner
).
( please see the picture of a very
phenomenal
structure situed on the hiden face of the
Moon and our analytical article on
the WEB: the Paris-Match's strange
affair n°1028.)
But let us give up with the " sons of the Elohim" with the mystery of their fertility, that has so often been debated about the sex of angels and let us ask ourselves how a God who knows everything, who is ubiquitous, and powerful, can allow himself to say
in Exodus ch.20 ver.5:"
For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous
God... ". Of whom therefore an universal spirit can-he be jealous
if he is unique?
This is not the case then, and
Iahve can feel jealous only of the other Elohim who reigned with him on the planet. It is for that,
Jetro the
Moise's father-in-law,
will tell in Exodus ch.18,
ver.11: "Now I know that the Lord is greater than all other
gods".Similarly we find far away in
ch.22, ver.20: "Whoever sacrifices to any Elohim, save only than Iahve, must be utterly destroyed
."
Finally we will end by the vers. 28 Chap.
22. "You will not blaspheme (the) Elohim and you will not curse the sovereign of your
people" (and some bibles write also:
"and you will not curse "the
prince" or the "ruler" of your people").
Here theologians will be forced to observe that Iahve admits therefore the presence of the other Elohim who do not have to be blasphemed, but that only the sovereign of the people therefore
Iahve himself has to receive sacrifices and to be
"specially respected".
Indeed, the sovereign of the people is not Moses as some translators understood it, but exactly Iahve, because Moise has never been appointed to the role of neither
sovereign, nor prince, and not even chief of the
people. It is only
a simple messenger chosen to transmit orders of Iavhe: " And Elohim said moreover to Moses:"You shall say to the children of Isreal,that the Elohim of your fathers , the Elohim of Abraham, the Elohim of Isaac and the Elohim of Jacob has sent me to you..."
(Exodus
III,15).
We could quote again many other passages of the A.T. where
it is mentionned the plurality of the Elohim, that henceforth have to be considered as a
"united people",
very avanced, coming of the sky, and using of spacial vessels like "flying
saucers". Indeed the
A.T. designates these vessels by words that were available to this period where no technology still exist . These words are:
pillar of clouds,
pillar of fire,
chariots of fire,
whirlwinds,
power and glory,
sheafs of fire,
etc...In here are some
examples:"By day Iahve went ahead of them the day in a
pillar of cloud
to guide them on their way and by night in a
pillar of fire,
to give them light, so that they could travel by day or night.
Neither pillar of cloud by day nor
pillar of fire left its place in front of the people ."
(Ex.13: 21 and 22).
And we knows that Moise stayed 40 days and 40 nights in
this cloud.
When Iahve was about to take Elijah up to heaven in a
whirlwind, Elijah and Elisha, were on their way from Guilgal...".
(II Kings ch.2 ver.1)
" As they were walking along and talking together, suddenly
a chariot of fire and
horses of fire
appeared and separated the two of them , and Elijah went up to heaven
in a whirlwing. Elisha saw this and cried out," My father! My father!
The chariots and horsemen of
Israel!.. " ver.11 and
12)."
" the
chariots of Elohim are tens of thousands
and thousands of thousands;
the Lord has come from Sinai into his
santuary".Psalm 68 ver. 17
To close this short statement on the Elohim and their power , let us note again the episode where a Elohim get involved in a persistent struggle with Jacob who will assert in
Genesis ch.32, ver.30 this surprising thing: "
It is I saw Elohim face to face and yet my life was
preserved." Consequently this Elohim is undoubtelly only one of the intermediaries between us and the
Cosmic God or the Universal Spirit this "
Subtle and thinking Energy " situated probably in
the fourth dimension or in
still more upper dimensions that Jesus-Christ honored and venerates under the denomination of "
My Father " and who organizes the World with all material and of spiritual things and that other people call" the Architect of the Universe ".Is-it not written indeed in Matthieu VI-6: "But when you pray, go into your room close the door and pray to your Father who is there in the secret
place..."
Elohim asserts nowhere that he possesses a son called " Jesus-Christ" and
conversely Jesus has never told that the "Elohim
Iahve" was him spiritual father whose he rejects moreover a priori "the talion's
law"
: "You have heard that it was said: Eye for eye, and and tooth for tooth. But me I tell you do not resist an evil person..if some one striques you on the right cheek, turn to him the other
also." Matthieu V-38.
Is-it not this, really, the application of the "Non
Violence",a
law, so dear to the Mahatma Gandhi and of which we got pieces of evidence?
Iahve is therefore only the lord of Elohim, indeed
a cosmic master very in advance as compared to us,(having
left may be, traces of his trip on
the Moon or in the vicinity, on
Mars for exemple).Please
see about this, our article on Mars at the
adresses:
http://www.chez.com/idylle/docs/marsang.html
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/fidylle/docs/marsang.html
where this picture below is taken from:
but who have something in common with a Jupiter or a Zeus of Greek and Latin mythologies and who has chosen to carry all his attention
on the Israel Nation and whose he is going to follow until our days seems-it the evolution, to return and choose in the useful time, without any doubt, the
good servants.
Then will appear on the foothills of the Mount Sinai
, the "twinkling ufos" or rather as it was told formerly
" the flamboyant chariots of
Iahve" that will take to the heavens, "the chosen
ones". By the way finally , let us remind also to close this short thesis, the prophecy of the
St Marc's Gospel on
Ch. XIII, vers.26 and 27: "And at that time men will see the Son of Man coming in clouds with great power and glory. And he will send his angels and gather his elect from the four
winds..."
But who will be in this case those elected people?...and will we be able to participate in ?
IV From the existence of a SECRET CODE in the Bible
In May 1997
appeared at ROBERT
LAFFONT'S PUBLISHINGS:"The BIBLE:
Secret code ", a surprising book of
Mr Michael DROSNIN
ancient correspondent of the Washington Post and of the Wall Street Newspaper and who unveiled the discovery in the
Hebrew Bible of a secret code clarifying ,there are more of
30 centuries, principal current events and giving the name of celebrities implied with a luxury of unthinkable details.
This secret code that was discovered only by using of powerful computers and with highly efficient mathematic has been presented the first time in the American review,
SATISTICAL SCIENCE that is the organ of the
Institute of Mathematical statistics in its volume 9 nƒ 3 of August 1994 at pages 429 to 438
is presented by 3 eminent researchers
Doron WIztum, Eliyahu Rips et Yoav Rosenberg
under the title"Equidistant Letters Sequences in the Book of
Genesis."
We discover thus for example, that not only the assassination of YITZHAK RABIN is registered there, but also the name of his assassin Amir, the city where has taken place:TEL-AVIV and the year:
1995. But therefore he was warned of this danger that threatened him, the Israeli Prime Minister has nothing been able to do for preventing this murder yet anticipated there is close to
3000 years in the Hebrew text.
Similarly we find there revelations of assassinations of the Egyptian President Sadate, of the
American President Kennedy and of hundred of other events dealing with the second world war, by quoting
HITLER the NAZI
enemy and his Massacres, passing by the holocaust of Hiroshima, the landing on
the MOON..
and even the coming of the SHOEMAKER-LEVY Comet
and the date of 16 July 1994
where it was going to
knock JUPITER.
It would be there , tedious to reveal some more and to these who want to go thoroughly into the question, let them consult now
the book of M. DROSNIN, and they will go with surprises and surprises.
V Conclusion
If therefore, the whole of that is
true, (and statistical calculations seem to confirm it), it is no longer remaining to us, on the one hand that the next events that threaten us and that will be able to be discovered in this secret code,
will not surprise us brutally
and that we will be able so to avoid them, if that is possible, or yet at least to lessen their effects, but on the other hand and that is more annoying, it will be necessary to question ourselves on the fact that our ancestors and especially these who elaborated or inspired the hebrew texts ,
(May-be is it really this lord of the
Elohim Iahve who is at the origin of all that), had a flawless mastery of the cosmic laws
and especially of those that manage the space-time continum .
Making out this article on the 15/09/98
and up dating it on the
25/04/2001.
IDYLLE
Fred
fred.idylle@wanadoo.fr
Back to the index page
|